Avoiding misinformation
I need to be cautious about not hallucinating current news since my last knowledge update was in October 2024, and now it’s December 2025. This could relate to a recent poll. I should avoid making definitive statements and instead ask for context or links. The user might want help rewriting, such as polishing a headline. I could offer options like translating, writing an article, or analyzing data. Additionally, I can provide a quick analysis of tactical choices like formations.Analyzing player strengths
I’m focusing on the key strengths of Kubo and Guedes. Kubo excels in ball retention, pressing, and using half-space while Guedes has direct pace and a transition threat, though he can be inconsistent and may struggle with defensive tracking. I should stick to generic metrics and provide suggested match situations for their use, along with rotation strategies based on the opponent's block height. I'll offer options for a poll or article, plus a concise analysis in bullet points.
I'll keep things concise!
这是个很像新闻标题的说法。你希望我做哪种帮助？
- 改写/润色标题
- 写一段战术快评
- 列出取舍的利弊清单
- 做一篇短评稿或社媒帖
- 查证来源链接并总结
先给你一个超短战术判断，供参考：
- 何时用格德斯：需要更强的纵深冲击、直线推进和反击威胁时；对手防线高、留身后空间时更合适。
- 何时用久保建英：需要稳定控球、右路半空间的小范围配合与压迫组织时；对手退得深，需要耐心撕开的比赛更合适。
- 连锁影响：格德斯先发可能提升转换速度，但右路防守保护与前场反抢一致性略降；久保先发则利于控节奏与压迫质量，但直接威胁可能更依赖团队配合。
- 折中思路：久保先发稳局面，60’后视比赛态势以格德斯提速；或让久保更居中/自由位，右侧给格德斯冲刺，形成“稳+冲”的搭配。
需要我按其中一个方向展开吗？
